The Aesthetics of Culture and Color
Counter-cultural Aesthetics
Dogtown and Z-Boys (on scoop.it! and geographyeducation.org)
- Articles
- APHG Faculty Lectures
- Assessing the Validity of Online Sources
- Brexit: Reaction and the Aftermath
- Comparing Urban Footprints
- Geographic Imagination in the English Anthem ‘Jerusalem’
- Geography on Twitter
- Israeli-Palestinian Conflict updates, 2016
- Learning From Home
- Political and Economic Geography Presentations
- Start-of-the-Year Videos
- Strava Heat Map and National Security
- Teaching about Syrian Refugees
- Thanksgiving Resources
- The Atlas of Economic Complexity: the Case of Costa Rica
- The Geography of E-Waste
- Videos: How Does it Grow?
- California’s Drought
- Cultural Meaning in Moving Monuments
- Gerrymandering
- Navigating and Occupying Gendered Space
- Place and Flash Mobs
- Imaginary Geographies
- Older Articles
- Regional
- Thematic
- Geospatial
- Courses
- Presentations
- About
October 17, 2012 at 11:13 am
The issue of color in Baghdad definitely speaks to the notion of privilege. A younger, more inexperienced generation of artists are being harshly judged by the power elite. Phrases like “people living in villages with animals”, and “they don’t understand anything” give strong indications of class. Art is subjective by any measure, and shouldn’t incur this level of prejudice, however absurd and lurid the color combinations may be.
November 20, 2012 at 11:31 am
I have read all three articles of Aesthetics and Privilege. I want to start with in Baghdad. In Baghdad, since the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime the people of Iraq especially Baghdad were allowed the right to color their buildings in any color they want. This also goes to other cities around the world like Izamal in Mexico and Wilemstad the capital of the island of Curacao in the Caribbean. My conclusion to my comment will be that tourism will increase around the world if the people can see many different colors on all of the buildings.